Allulose vs Monk Fruit: How Do These Natural Sweeteners Compare?

Searching for a sweetener that won't spike your blood sugar? Allulose and monk fruit are two of the most popular natural sugar substitutes on the market. But how do these plant-based sweeteners compare when it comes to taste, nutrition, and health impacts?

With sugar intake an ever-increasing health concern, the demand for non-nutritive sweeteners has skyrocketed. Allulose, derived from wheat and fruits, provides the taste and texture of sugar with minimal calories and carbs. 

Monk fruit extract, made from an Asian melon, offers high sweetness and antioxidant benefits. While both allulose and monk fruit promote blood sugar control, differences emerge in areas like cost, baking performance, and more. 

Let’s compare and contrast allulose and monk fruit to determine the best uses for each of these intriguing sweeteners. Discover how to satisfy your sweet tooth while optimizing nutrition and health.

TLDR; Allulose vs Monk Fruit

  • Allulose and monk fruit are natural low-carb sweeteners that don't spike blood sugar.

  • Allulose tastes like sugar with 70% of the sweetness and works well in baking.

  • Monk fruit is 100-250 times sweeter than sugar.

  • Monk fruit is zero calories and offers weight loss benefits and antioxidants; allulose acts a low calorie alternative.

  • Both cost more than sugar but are safe, low-glycemic alternatives.

An Overview of Allulose

Allulose is a rare sugar that occurs naturally in small amounts in foods like wheat, figs and raisins. Unlike regular table sugar, allulose has minimal impact on blood sugar levels and provides just 0.4 calories per gram. 

Allulose is made by enzymatically converting fructose from corn into allulose. The end result is a white crystalline powder that looks and tastes very similar to sugar, making it an ideal substitute in baking, beverages and more. Allulose bakes, browns and dissolves like regular sugar but with 70% of the sweetness. 

This sugar substitute produces moist baked goods with a delicate sweetness. The biggest downside is the high cost compared to table sugar. But for those monitoring blood sugar levels or calories, allulose provides the sweet taste of sugar with none of the drawbacks.

An Overview of Monk Fruit Extract

Allulose vs Monk Fruit 2 - moderndose.com

Monk fruit, also called luo han guo, is a small melon from Southern China and Thailand long used in Eastern medicine. The fruit extract contains unique antioxidants called mogrosides that give it its ultra-sweet taste up to 250 times sweeter than regular sugar. 

Monk fruit is produced by crushing the melon to collect the mogrosides, filtering out the seeds and skin then drying it into a concentrated powder. With zero calories, carbohydrates or glycemic impact, monk fruit is popular for low sugar diets like keto.

Monk fruit is sometimes blended with erythritol since erythritol has a fresh sweetness flavor, so the two complement each other nicely and still reap the benefits. It can be used in baked goods but doesn’t brown or caramelize like sugar. Overall, monk fruit provides the sweetness of sugar substitutes like stevia without the bitter aftertaste.

A Nutritional Comparison of Using Allulose and Monk Fruit

When it comes to nutrition, allulose and monk fruit are dramatically different from regular table sugar. While sugar has 15 calories and 4 grams of carbohydrates per teaspoon, allulose and monk fruit have minimal calories, carbs and no glycemic impact. 

Allulose has 0.4 calories per gram, while monk fruit has zero calories. Monk fruit has zero net carbs, making it ideal for low-carb diets. Allulose has 0.2 net carbs per teaspoon, making it a good sugar substitute for diabetes management. The same can be said for monk fruit.

Neither allulose or monk fruit contain vitamins or minerals. But studies show monk fruit contains powerful antioxidants that provide health benefits. Both allulose and monk fruit produce negligible changes in blood glucose or insulin when consumed. 

This makes them safe for diabetics when used in moderation. Overall, both sugar substitutes promote better blood sugar control compared to regular sugar without sacrificing sweetness.

Health Benefits of Allulose and Monk Fruit

Both allulose and monk fruit offer health benefits that make them smart alternatives to regular sugar. Consuming sugar substitutes like allulose and monk fruit in moderate amounts may support weight loss and diabetes management. 

Studies show that replacing sugar with allulose can reduce body fat and weight in animal models. The lack of insulin response allows sweet foods with allulose to minimize fat storage compared to sugar-sweetened foods. Monk fruit may also aid modest weight loss thanks to zero calories and carbohydrates. 

For diabetics, allulose and monk fruit improve post-meal blood glucose levels compared to meals with added sugar. Small doses of monk fruit extract have reduced oxidative stress and inflammation in diabetics. With antioxidants like mogrosides, monk fruit may also benefit heart health. However, more research is needed on human studies. 

Overall, both allulose and monk fruit promote multiple markers of health when used instead of sugar.

Cost Comparison

Allulose vs Monk Fruit 3 - moderndose.com

Allulose and monk fruit cost significantly more than regular granulated sugar. Allulose costs around $0.50 per ounce compared to just $0.015 per ounce for sugar. Monk fruit costs approximately $0.30 per ounce. 

The high prices stem from the intensive extraction processes required for both sweeteners, pushing them into the category of specialty ingredients. Allulose is currently only made by a few manufacturers, limiting competitive pricing. Monk fruit must be sourced from Asia with labor-intensive harvesting, transporting the rare fruit globally. 

Sugar production benefits from centuries of cultivation and economies of scale. While prices have dropped recently as production expands, allulose and monk fruit remain premium ingredients. However, consumers are often willing to pay a premium for low-calorie, low-carb sweeteners.

Recipes and Substitutions

Allulose and monk fruit can be easily incorporated into recipes as substitutes for sugar with some ratio adjustments. In baked goods, use a 1:1 sugar to allulose substitution for adequate sweetness and moisture. 

Monk fruit is much sweeter, so combine it with sugar alcohols like erythritol in a 1:1 ratio to replace sugar. For example, use 1/2 cup monk fruit and 1/2 cup erythritol for every 1 cup of sugar. Monk fruit caramelizes so it works well in dishes like crème brûlée. Allulose produces excellent candies, frostings and syrups. 

However, neither perform as well as sugar in making caramel or ice cream. For beverages, use about 1 1/2 teaspoons allulose per 1 teaspoon sugar or just 1/4 teaspoon monk fruit. Getting the ratios right requires some experimentation.

But both allulose and monk fruit can deliver the satisfying sweetness of sugar in everything from cakes to cookies when used properly.

 

FAQs About Allulose vs Monk Fruit as Sweeteners

Allulose vs Monk Fruit 4 - moderndose.com

Which is Healthier Monk Fruit or Allulose?

Both monk fruit and allulose are very healthy alternatives to added sugar. Monk fruit may have an edge due to its powerful antioxidants. But both support blood sugar control.

What is The Downside of Allulose?

The main downside of allulose is the high cost compared to regular sugar. Allulose is priced around $0.50 per ounce.

Which is healthier allulose or erythritol?

Allulose and erythritol are both considered healthy sugar substitutes. Allulose is absorbed by the body while erythritol is excreted unchanged, so some may prefer allulose.

Is Allulose Banned in Europe?

No, allulose is recognized as safe and approved for use in Europe after initial confusion with its novel food status.

What is a Drawback of Allulose Compared to Sugar?

A drawback is that allulose is only 70% as sweet as sugar. So you may need to use more allulose than an equal amount of sugar.

 Key Takeaways: Allulose vs Monk Fruit

When it comes to low-calorie sweeteners, both allulose and monk fruit sweeteners have advantages over sugar. Allulose mimics the taste of sugar and maple syrup and works well in baking. Monk fruit is an ultra-sweet, zero-calorie sweetener perfect for low-carb diets. Choosing between these natural sweeteners depends on your needs.

Allulose performs similarly to sugar in recipes. Monk fruit is significantly sweeter and lacks sugar's caramelization. While expensive, using small amounts of allulose or monk fruit sweetener can positively impact your health. 

Give these intriguing sugar substitutes a try to reduce sugar without losing flavor and enjoyment. Discover how allulose and monk fruit can satisfy cravings while optimizing blood sugar control and nutrition. With the right information, you can harness these healthy sweeteners to enhance your wellbeing.